public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan Gardiner <bog@khumba.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New category for AI related packages
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:01:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250312110115.52ef3783@khumba.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64ec26fc-4623-4018-91b1-36d0e3061b77@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2094 bytes --]

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:42:49 -0400
Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 3/10/25 4:53 PM, Maciej Barć wrote:
> > Hi!
> >   
> >> Although maybe it should be sci-ml.  
> > 
> > Let's _not_ use *-ml since for us ml stands for OCaml (which comes from
> > ML - "Meta langauge").
> > 
> > sci-ai, dev-ai, and app-ai (say, "app-ai/ollama"?) are nice IMO.  
> 
> 
> - please don't top-post
> 
> - Let's _not_ use *-ai since AI stands for generative artificial
>   intelligence which most of these packages are not, even according to
>   the intended use of the *-ai term in this thread
> 
> I don't understand your argument at all. "ml" is hardly a reserved
> concept, and dev-ml exists precisely for "libraries and utilities
> relevant to the ML programming language", which isn't going to get
> confused with sci-ml/ for the same reason nobody would dream of
> searching in sci-cpp/ for "scientific software written in C++", as the
> emphasis is on *science* and naturally brings the concept of machine
> learning to mind.
> 
> I could argue that "AI" is too confusing of a term to use because it is
> the name of the pale-throated sloth (and because there are other
> abbreviations that are DEEPLY not on topic for this mailing list). But
> fortunately people possess the ability to recognize context, and will
> recognize that Gentoo packages are not talking about members of the
> animal kingdom. They will also recognize sci-machine-learning when they
> see it.
> 
> Or, we could bite the bullet and stop clinging "short and witty two-word
> categories".
> 
> Let's call it "sci-machine-learning/".

How about "sci-learn/"?  Not too long, and too ambiguous.

> But obviously, whatever we call it shouldn't feel like deceptive
> trickery to the people ***using*** the packages from this proposed new
> category. So I oppose anything with the name "ai" in it, as it's way too
> specific, unless it is strictly limited to e.g. ollama, which isn't
> actually packaged in ::gentoo and isn't actually on topic as a result.

Cheers,
Bryan

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-12 18:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-10 20:40 [gentoo-dev] New category for AI related packages Alfredo Tupone
2025-03-10 20:49 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-03-10 20:53   ` Maciej Barć
2025-03-10 22:42     ` Eli Schwartz
2025-03-10 22:59       ` Maciej Barć
2025-03-11  6:44         ` Ulrich Müller
2025-03-12 20:57         ` Eli Schwartz
2025-03-12 18:01       ` Bryan Gardiner [this message]
2025-03-10 20:56 ` Filip Kobierski
2025-03-13 13:07   ` Arsen Arsenović
2025-03-14 12:22     ` Sam James
2025-03-14 15:08       ` Gordon Pettey
2025-03-16 12:16         ` Arsen Arsenović
2025-03-16 14:52       ` Jaco Kroon
2025-03-10 22:28 ` Ionen Wolkens
2025-03-12  7:47 ` Florian Schmaus
2025-03-12 20:13   ` Alfredo Tupone
2025-03-15  9:09   ` Petr Vaněk
2025-03-15 15:29   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2025-03-16 13:13     ` Ulrich Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250312110115.52ef3783@khumba.net \
    --to=bog@khumba.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox