public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kuzetsa <kuzetsa@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Repo mirror & CI: official statement wrt GitHub
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 12:03:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <068c46f9-cc89-702b-8c77-94896e1bf321@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=7_YwtBzTv+8XSVh8xUG2rsPZwc_t9rEaswJ_9O9XuDQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/15/2018 11:31 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:55 AM kuzetsa <kuzetsa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> "Gentoo Developer's Certificate of Origin" - shouldn't
>> the author / contributor themselves be involved in this?
>>
> 
> It already requires this.  The committer would have to certify:
> 
> " (4) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other person
>         who certified (1), (2), (3), or (4), and I have not modified it."
> 
> (or one of the other items in the list, if they did modify it)
> 
> Ultimately the committer is the person Gentoo has a relationship with,
> so they need to make the certification when they make the commit, even
> if it is just certifying that somebody else certified it.
> 
> This goes along with something Thomas said earlier - ultimately the
> committers are responsible for what they commit.  There really isn't a
> sane alternative since the whole reason we try to control our
> committers is to ensure that things don't end up in the repository
> which shouldn't be there.  This isn't diminishing the value of 3rd
> party contributors - but simply affirming the value-add of having
> somebody we know actually look at what is being contributed.  That
> includes the copyright/license and not just the code.  After all, all
> this stuff ends up on all our users's systems so we want to protect
> them as well as ourselves.  Users already have the freedom to use any
> overlays they wish if they value these things differently.
> 
> --
> Rich
> 

OH!!! (thanks, I completely missed that detail)

from: "$ man git-commit" :  [...] The meaning of a
signoff depends on the project, but it typically
certifies that committer has the rights to submit
this work [...]

this is frustratingly vague (to me), but I suppose
the extra metadata included in the same paragraph
has a link to: https://developercertificate.org/

---
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me
by some other person who certified (a), (b) or (c)
and I have not modified it.
---

^ took me a few minutes to figure out what you meant,
or where that particular quote came from:

I had never considered this, because historically,
gentoo developers who use their PGP key to commit
rarely use the --signoff feature when committing the
submissions of a contributor, and even if they had,
there's not a stable definition.

in particular, I'm considering the meaning of the phrase:

"some other person who certified" - does this mean the
contributor needs to use their PGP key to sign or...?

it would be good for gentoo to have clarity on this.

I think it could lessen feelings / perceptions that
contributors ought to maintain a copy of the work on a 3rd
party mirror until it is no longer useful (IMO, at least).

-- kuza


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-15 16:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-09  7:25 [gentoo-project] Repo mirror & CI: official statement wrt GitHub Michał Górny
2018-06-09  7:50 ` Ulrich Mueller
2018-06-09  7:52   ` Michał Górny
2018-06-09  9:11     ` Thomas Deutschmann
2018-06-11 12:15     ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-06-11 13:28     ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-14  9:47       ` James Le Cuirot
2018-06-14 14:14         ` Alec Warner
2018-06-14 14:25           ` Mauricio Lima Pilla
2018-06-15  0:33           ` Thomas Deutschmann
2018-06-15  1:14             ` Aaron W. Swenson
2018-06-15  2:16             ` Alec Warner
2018-06-15  7:20               ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2018-06-16 23:55               ` Virgil Dupras
2018-06-17  0:25                 ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-16 21:58           ` Andreas K. Huettel
2018-06-16 23:14             ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-16 23:45             ` Alec Warner
2018-06-17  1:05               ` Brian Dolbec
2018-06-14 19:55 ` kuzetsa
2018-06-15  0:26   ` Thomas Deutschmann
2018-06-15  2:27     ` kuzetsa
2018-06-15 11:50       ` Thomas Deutschmann
2018-06-15 14:55         ` kuzetsa
2018-06-15 15:31           ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-15 16:03             ` kuzetsa [this message]
2018-06-15 16:11               ` Rich Freeman
2018-06-15 16:22                 ` kuzetsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=068c46f9-cc89-702b-8c77-94896e1bf321@gmail.com \
    --to=kuzetsa@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox