From: Michael <confabulate@kintzios.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Video sometimes stuttering. Need help with ionice, maybe?
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 14:22:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24032501.6Emhk5qWAg@rogueboard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76de3c30-a8fb-d9b4-c9b4-417b0db5f9cf@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1257 bytes --]
On Thursday, 31 July 2025 12:25:01 British Summer Time Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 30 July 2025 18:25:00 British Summer Time Dale wrote:
> >> I rebooted the new kernel and the BFQ setting is doing a GREAT job. I've
> >> copied several GBs of data since the change and my videos play like a
> >> champ. I've yet to see a single stutter or pause.
> >
> > Have you selected either of the other schedulers as well?
>
> From my understanding, you can only select one at a time. So far, this
> is working wonderfully. A lot better than the previous one. What
> scheduler ones uses depends on what one needs. For some applications,
> others may work better. For what I need, BFQ is awesome.
>
> Can one use more than one at a time?
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
With more than one scheduler trying to manage the IO data queues on the
device, which scheduler will win the fight? The scheduler which messes up the
others' queues faster? LOL! :-)
On multi-queue SSDs the difference between IO schedulers is small, so setting
it to none (noop) removes any pointless kernel load. However, some have
reported mq-deadline performed slightly better on their gear.
A quick test will prove what scheduler suits best each use case.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-31 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-23 7:18 [gentoo-user] Video sometimes stuttering. Need help with ionice, maybe? Dale
2025-07-23 18:44 ` Michael
2025-07-23 21:07 ` Dale
2025-07-30 17:25 ` Dale
2025-07-31 10:36 ` Peter Humphrey
2025-07-31 11:25 ` Dale
2025-07-31 13:22 ` Michael [this message]
2025-07-31 14:12 ` [gentoo-user] " Holger Hoffstätte
2025-07-31 14:53 ` Michael
2025-07-31 14:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24032501.6Emhk5qWAg@rogueboard \
--to=confabulate@kintzios.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox