From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Marius Mauch <google-soc@genone.de>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-soc] Progress Report - Revdep-rebuild
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:47:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080821154740.GD6086@comet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4cdc1420808202009g121e10f9m5e79f741ab8d3918@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1409 bytes --]
On 22:09 Wed 20 Aug , Lucian Poston wrote:
> Last week's work was interesting. As mentioned in the last report, I
> significantly modified LinkageMap to utilize path's inodes rather
> os.path.realpath for path comparisons -- basically, reducing the
> amount of filesystem access. It turned out to improve its efficiency,
> which in turn improved the efficiency of MisingLibraryConsumerSet as
> it relies on LinkageMap.listBrokenBinaries.
I just encountered a problem recently and wondered whether your work
might help it at all. The situation is uninstalling a library that
system packages link against. The problem I hit involves
sys-apps/shadow[USE=audit] and sys-process/audit, which I just hit on my
own system, breaking /bin/login.
It seems like this could become part of the linkage map and thus give
the user a warning, if it's not already -- I haven't been following this
incredibly closely.
What do you think?
> For future endeavors, I will explore adding a new entry into
> /var/db/pkg to catalog libtool libraries (similar in nature to
> NEEDED.ELF.2). Currently, the contents of all packages are searched
> in order to find libtool libraries, so having them available in the
> vdb_path will speed things up.
Ick, libtool libraries are the worst.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-21 3:09 [gentoo-soc] Progress Report - Revdep-rebuild Lucian Poston
2008-08-21 15:47 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2008-08-21 18:09 ` Lucian Poston
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-11 23:12 Lucian Poston
2008-08-01 21:24 Lucian Poston
2008-07-27 6:28 Lucian Poston
2008-07-20 9:23 Lucian Poston
2008-07-12 3:13 Lucian Poston
2008-06-26 1:30 Lucian Poston
2008-06-26 17:47 ` Marius Mauch
2008-06-15 3:55 Lucian Poston
2008-06-17 15:55 ` Marius Mauch
2008-06-15 3:34 Lucian Poston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080821154740.GD6086@comet \
--to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-soc@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=google-soc@genone.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox