public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bkhl@elektrubadur.se (Björn Lindström)
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: USE flags
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:34:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k76viqp9.fsf@lucien.dreaming> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031023175925.5c346637.spider@gentoo.org

Spider <spider@gentoo.org> writes:

> Well, the reason I suggest making it a FEATURE instead of anything else
> is because that way we can include the whole package of man
> pages and documentation in built binary packages, but simply prevent it
> from entering the "final" system afterwards. 
>
> This would probably just mean a few lines to check the feature, and if
> it exists, scan usr/share/doc and remove all files that want to install
> there...  

And why couldn't those lines check the INSTALL_PROTECT (if that's what
we'll call it) variable? Including the non-installed files in binary
packages would work doesn't really have anything to do with whether this
is implemented as a FEATURE flag or a separate variable.

The disadvantage of having FEATURE:s for it, is that it will be limited
to certain directories. Using a configuration variable, people can apply
it to whatever they want.

-- 
Björn Lindström <bkhl@elektrubadur.se>
http://bkhl.elektrubadur.se/


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-23 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-22 21:34 [gentoo-dev] USE flags A. Craig West
2003-10-22 22:36 ` Dhruba Bandopadhyay
2003-10-22 22:58   ` david
2003-10-23  0:41     ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-10-23  8:46       ` Spider
2003-10-23  8:49         ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-10-23  9:14           ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-10-23  9:45         ` [gentoo-dev] " Björn Lindström
2003-10-23 11:07           ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-10-23 11:20             ` Björn Lindström
2003-10-23 11:43               ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-10-23 12:35                 ` Björn Lindström
2003-10-23 11:39         ` [gentoo-dev] " Philippe Coulonges
2003-10-23 12:20           ` Christian Birchinger
2003-10-23 13:03             ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo on the ARM Cliff Free
2003-10-23 14:01               ` Mike Frysinger
2003-10-23 15:59             ` [gentoo-dev] USE flags Spider
2003-10-23 21:34               ` Björn Lindström [this message]
2003-10-23 23:08                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Spider
2003-10-24 15:16                   ` Christian Birchinger
2003-10-25  1:41                     ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-23 12:25           ` Björn Lindström
2003-10-23 19:27         ` [gentoo-dev] " Masatomo Nakano
2003-10-23  0:40 ` Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k76viqp9.fsf@lucien.dreaming \
    --to=bkhl@elektrubadur.se \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox