public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signing everything, for fun and for profit
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 15:10:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1148130640.6290.34.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <446ECF96.9090607@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2012 bytes --]

On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 10:13 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
> 
> > Signing strategies
> > ==================
> > 
> > Once there is an agreement on what files to sign with what kind of keys
> > there remains the question how to sign it. There are at least three
> > strategies:
> > [...]
> 
> I prefer a semi-secure solution appearing soon rather than waiting
> another three+ years for a potentially better solution.
A staged plan might be best then:
- implement a simple master-key signing
- discuss the more complex distributed models
- implement the distributed models if agreed upon

> Currently users only have two choices :
> 
> - masterkey-signed portage snapshots
> - unsigned (and so, insecure) rsync mirrors
> 
> This is obviously not satisfying.
Yes. It also gives us ~100 single points of attacks as every compromised rsync mirror could go undetected for a long time.

> It has taken years to try to get per-developer signing implemented,
> without success. We should try to do masterkey signing ("simple" method)
> and see if we go somewhere. It's is so much better than nothing.
There is no authority that "forces" signing.
Making signing mandatory should not cause big problems now ...

> So I would rather work on ensuring everything in portage gets properly
> signed rather than designing key policies, cross-signing strategies and
> ways to force developers to sign properly. Given the current state of
> Gentoo it is a much more reachable goal.
"properly signed" implies some standard or policy to measure it against.

So we need to have some agreement what is needed to assure "properly
signed everything" - it looks like the centralized masterkey model will
have the smallest impact on all involved. Then we look at all issues
this model has, try to fix all bugs - then we have a plan to implement,
and I hope that this will happen in a reasonable timeframe.

Patrick
-- 
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-20 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-18 21:45 [gentoo-dev] Signing everything, for fun and for profit Patrick Lauer
2006-05-18 23:53 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-05-18 23:54   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-05-19  4:26 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-05-20  2:03   ` Ned Ludd
2006-05-20 13:03     ` Patrick Lauer
2006-05-20 13:21   ` Jan Kundrát
2006-05-20 20:47     ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-05-21 10:40       ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-05-19  9:46 ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-19 11:20   ` Patrick Lauer
2006-05-19 14:13     ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-19 14:39       ` Andrew Gaffney
2006-05-19 15:17         ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-19 15:26           ` John Myers
2006-05-19 16:10             ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-19 13:30               ` Thomas Cort
2006-05-20  6:30               ` Alin Nastac
2006-05-19 15:32           ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-05-19 15:35           ` Harald van Dijk
2006-05-19 15:26       ` Patrick Lauer
2006-05-19 16:06         ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-19 16:50       ` Marius Mauch
2006-05-19 17:04         ` Harald van Dijk
2006-05-19 16:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2006-05-19 16:41   ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-19 16:51   ` Stephen Bennett
2006-05-19 17:26   ` Marius Mauch
2006-05-20  5:44     ` Lance Albertson
2006-05-19 17:45 ` [gentoo-dev] " Marius Mauch
2006-05-20  8:13 ` Thierry Carrez
2006-05-20 13:10   ` Patrick Lauer [this message]
2006-05-20 10:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2006-05-20 14:37   ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-20 14:51     ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2006-05-21 11:31       ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-21 13:49         ` Francesco Riosa
2006-05-20 23:48   ` [gentoo-dev] " Robin H. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1148130640.6290.34.camel@localhost \
    --to=patrick@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox